INTERIM CRIT 01
Comments
1.Massing / Tone down rigid building block, look like industry/ factory
2.Efficiency / Too many corridors on plan, should be reduce (especially B1 Floor)
3.Organic Fluidity / for parks, linkage to the adjacent landscape
4.Perception of Space / Life celebration, psychological & emotional aspect should be considered for
space design
5. Narration of Space / User experience going through different space
INTERIM CRIT 02
Comments
DESIGN PART
1. Grouping according to different religion practices are missing. Need specific different ritual practices allocation in plans.
2. Percentage of burial lots for different religion allocation need to be according to local demographic.
TECHNICAL PART
1. Service block and service road need to be considered.
- separation of service road with main entrance
- separation entrance of bereavers(with deceased) & visitors
2. Underground Structures need to be considered.
3. Security control of the building need to be considered.
FINAL CRIT
Comments
1. Site Selection /
- An usually and thought provoking way to look at cemetery, and very interesting choice of site.
- Long & slender site is challenging.
2. Sensitivity /
- A very well thought out scheme with sensitivity to various religious requirements, though finer details on the rituals may be questionable.
- The "emotionless" way to investigate this typology and relating to sustainability is commendable.
- Psychological issue is considered. However ritual differentiation is challenging.
3. Presented Drawings /
- Good sections to illustrate hidden activities.